🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in other EU countries